R v Y (A)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Hughes |
| Judgment Date | 27 April 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 762 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201000534 C5 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 27 April 2010 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Perrin v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
...was capable of constituting a reasonable excuse” [emphasis added] and referred to a previous Court of Appeal decision R v AY [2010] EWCA Crim 762, 1WLR 2644 in which Hughes LJ, giving the judgment of the court, said this (at [21]): A defendant must be allowed to say what his purpose was in ......
-
B v DPP
...s. 113 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ( McMillan v HM Advocate [2010] HCJAC 103), s.5(5) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 ( R v Evans [2005] 1 Cr App R 546), s.42A (1) of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, s80(4), (6) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 ( Pol......
-
Paul Dunleavy v R
...should only withdraw a defence of reasonable excuse under section 58(3) Terrorism Act 2000 if, as a matter of law, no jury could accept it ( R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762; [2010] 2 Cr App R 15 at paragraph 25: “We accept the proposition […] that a defence of reasonable excuse advanced und......
-
Christine Perrin v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
...was capable of constituting a reasonable excuse” [emphasis added] and referred to a previous Court 18 of Appeal decision R v AY [2010] EWCA Crim 762, 1WLR 2644 in which Hughes LJ, giving the judgment of the court, said this (at [21]): “A defendant must be allowed to say what his purpose was......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Any Excuse for Certainty: English Perspectives on the Defence of ‘Reasonable Excuse’
...further safeguards, e.g the consent of the DPP is required before charges are brought under s. 117(2)(a) ofthe Terrorism Act 2000. 87 [2010] EWCA Crim 762, [2010] 2 Cr App R The Journal of Criminal Law judge’s ruling that a defence of self-defence should be left to the jury,stating that any......