Bonnick v Morris

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Nicholls of Birkenhead
Judgment Date17 June 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] UKPC 31
CourtPrivy Council
Docket NumberAppeal No. 30 of 2001
Date17 June 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
190 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Privilege, And This Time We Mean It
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 17 May 2007
    ...WLR 2571, Lukowiak v Unidad Editorial [2001] EMLR 1043, Al Fagih -v- HH Saudi Research & Marketing [2002] EMLR 215; Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300, Roberts v Gable [2006] EMLR 692 10 Gilbert v MGN [2000] EMLR 680, Baldwin v Rusbridger [2001] EMLR 47, Miller v Associated Newspapers [20......
  • The "Reynolds Public Interest Defence" And S.4 Of The UK Defamation Act 2013
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 13 November 2020
    ...are to have benefit of the privilege journalists must exercise due professional skill and care." (per Lord Nicholls in Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 Privy Council appeal from This balance between freedom of expression and reputation of individuals was recently considered by the UK Suprem......
  • Mayor Ford's Libel Case: 'I Can't Accuse Anyone'
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 23 January 2013
    ...ONSC 7189 at para. 9. Charleston v. News Group Newspapers Ltd., [1995] 2 A.C. 65, at 71, per Lord Bridge (H.L.). Bonnick v. Morris, [2003] 1 A.C. 300 at para. 9, per Lord Nicholls Charleston et al. v. News Group Newspapers Ltd., [1995] 2 A.C. 65 at 70, 72, per Lord Bridge (H.L.). 2012 ONSC ......
8 books & journal articles
  • The Defence of Responsible Communication
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guide to the Law and Practice of Anti-SLAPP Proceedings Part V. The Merits Hurdle
    • 13 June 2022
    ...possible meanings when considering the conduct to be expected of a responsible journalist in the circumstances” ( Bonnick v. Morris , [2002] UKPC 31, [2003] 1 A.C. 300 (P.C.), at para. 25, per Lord Nicholls). Under the defence of responsible communication, it is no longer necessary that the......
  • Lange and Reynolds qualified privilege: Australian and English defamation law and practice.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 No. 2, August 2004
    • 1 August 2004
    ...(Court of Appeal). (51) James Gilbert Ltd v MGN Ltd [2000] EMLR 680, 700 (Eady J). (52) Jameel [2004] EMLR 196. (53) Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300, 309 (Lord (54) Ibid. (55) [2002] EMLR 215 ('Al-Fagih'). (56) See Shah v Standard Chartered Bank [1999] QB 241. (57) Al-Fagih [2002] EMLR 215......
  • Campaigns of Vilification and Defamation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guide to the Law and Practice of Anti-SLAPP Proceedings Part I. Background and Context
    • 13 June 2022
    ...repetition . 410. As Lord Nicholls stated in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 at p200 (and repeated in Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 at para [23], in a passage quoted in Lait ), reputation is not just a matter of private or individual right: “ Reputation is an integral and......
  • Defamation law and free speech: Reynolds v. Times Newspapers and the English media.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 37 No. 5, November 2004
    • 1 November 2004
    ...James Gilbert v. MGN, [2000] E.M.L.R. 680; c.f. GKR Karate v. Yorkshire Post Newspapers, [2000] E.M.L.R. 410. (112.) Bonnick v. Morris, [2002] U.K.P.C. 31. (113.) Id. [paragraph] (114.) Al-Fagih v. H.H. Saudi Research & Marketing, [2002] E.M.L.R. 13 (Eng. C.A.). (115.) Id. at 13, 52 (Si......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT