Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Huntley v Simmonds

Cited authorities 5 Cited in 8 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Underhill
Judgment Date13 February 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] EWHC 405 (QB)
Docket NumberCase No: HQ/06X0342
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Date13 February 2009
Categories
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Huntley v Simmonds
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 February 2010
    ...EWCA Civ 54 [2009] EWHC 405 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEE'N'S BENCH DIVISION Mr Justice Before: Lord Justice Waller Vice-president of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division Lord Justice Laws and Lord Justice Eth......
  • Patricia Georgina Grant (widow and executrix of the estate of Douglas Michael Grant, deceased) v The Secretary of State for Transport
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 30 June 2017
    ...from the injury for which the defendant is responsible. Mr Limb made reference to the decision of Underhill J in Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 405 (QB), at [65], where there was no award for the time spent by relatives in hospital visits in the absence of evidence that they were providing ......
  • F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd v Barthelemy and another (No 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 June 2012
    ...a matter of course. That is a course neither mandated nor permitted either under Part 36 or under Part 44.3. Similarly, while the result in Huntley may be capable of being justified on the special facts, in my view it is not permissible wholly to discount a number of failures to comply with......
  • The Procter & Gamble Company v Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA and another [Ch D]
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 October 2012
    ...that the court might give effect to a non-compliant Part 36 offer by the exercise of discretion under Part 44 (as Underhill J did in Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 406 (QB)), this would be rare: "While the result in Huntley may be capable of being justified on the special facts, in my view ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT