Monkhill Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Mr Justice Holgate |
Judgment Date | 24 July 2019 |
Neutral Citation | [2019] EWHC 1993 (Admin) |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
Docket Number | Case No: CO/539/2019 |
Date | 24 July 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
R (on the application of Monkhill Ltd) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
...IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (PLANNING COURT) THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE HOLGATE [2019] EWHC 1993 (Admin) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Charles Banner Q.C. and Matthew Fraser (instructed by Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP)......
-
Rectory Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government
...( Tesco at [18]; Mansell at [41]; Canterbury at [23]; Monkhill Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2020] PTSR 416 at 45 The following more specific principles are to be found in case law:- (i) Reading a policy in accordance with the language used and its ......
-
R Holborn Studios Ltd v London Borough of Hackney
...Government [2019] PTSR 81 (see paragraph 23) and Monkhill Limited v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2019] EWHC 1993, with both of these authorities and the recent decision of Holgate J in Gladman v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Governm......
-
Gladman Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
...to the application, [(aza), (aa) and (b) …..], and (b) any other material considerations.” 4 In Monkhill Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2019] EWHC 1993 (Admin) I explained the framework for decision-making contained in paragraph 11(c) and (d) of......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Tilted Balance: Where Are We Now?
...permission (11(d)(i) NPPF). The wording of paragraph 11 remains unchanged. However in the recent judgment Monkhill Ltd v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 1993 (Admin) the High Court considered it key that paragraph 11(d)(i) is read with the footnote 6 which lists relevant polices which, if applicable, re......