R v Bagnall
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Moses |
| Judgment Date | 18 April 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWCA Crim 677 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2010/1595/B5 AND 2010/1178/B5 |
| Date | 18 April 2012 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Eric John Moss v The Crown
...second Ground, namely that the confiscation order was disproportionate and unfair, Mr Talbot accepted that, in the light of cases such as Bagnall [2013] 1 WLR 204, a confiscation order may properly be calculated from offences of which the defendant was not convicted – whether or not there i......
-
R v Harvey
...were cited in argument.The following additional cases, although not cited, were referred to in the skeleton arguments:R v Bagnall [2012] EWCA Crim 677; [2013] 1 WLR 204, CAR v Walbrook (1994) 15 Cr App R (S) 783, CAR v Wilkes [2003] EWCA Crim 848; [2003] 2 Cr App R (S) 625, CAAPPEAL against......
-
R v Paul Yearsley
...in the approach which the judge took. The judge's approach is indeed in our view wholly consistent with the judgment of this court in R v Bagnall and Sharma [2012] EWCA Crim 677, upon which Mr Davis placed some emphasis this morning. 18 Ground 2 is that the judge's findings as regards many ......
-
Imitaz Ali v The Queen
...In this case the prosecution were alleging that the applicant had been engaged in MTIC fraud. The case was Bagnall and Sharma [2012] EWCA Crim 677. The answer was that they could. It was in those broad circumstances that the part heard confiscation proceedings came back before the Recorder ......