R v Marsh (William)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | MR JUSTICE LAWS |
Judgment Date | 19 July 1996 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1996] EWCA Crim J0620-2 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Docket Number | No: 96/1589/Y4 |
Date | 19 July 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
- R v Williams (Jason John)
-
R v Williams (Jason)
... ... 14 In R v Marsh [1997] 1 Cr.App.R. 67 the court had to consider the provision under s.12(A)(1) of the Theft Act 1968 relating to aggravated vehicle taking. That ... ...
-
R v Hughes
... ... 34 We were referred to the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Marsh [1997] 1 Cr App R 67 , which was relied upon in Williams ... That case concerned the offence of aggravated vehicle taking, contrary to section 12A ... ...
-
R v Taylor
... ... The Crown sought to distinguish Hughes ... It relied on the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in R v Marsh [1997] 1 Cr App R 67 as authority for the proposition that there was no element of fault in the offence of aggravated vehicle taking. The ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...that blameworthy conduct was required would be to re-writes. 3ZB’. Thomas LJ applied the approach of the Court of Appeal in R vMarsh [1997] 1 Cr App R 67, where the court had held that fault inrelation to injury arising or damage caused was not required on a chargeof aggravated vehicle-taki......