R v McHugh
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE MUSTILL |
| Judgment Date | 10 November 1988 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1988] EWCA Crim J1110-2 |
| Date | 10 November 1988 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Nos. 1118/S/86 and |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
- Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (No. 3)
-
R v El-Kurd (No 2) ; R v K ; R v S ; R v X
...the removal by the 1995 amendment of the proviso to section 2 effected no change in the law. It relied on the decisions of this court in R v McHugh (1977) 64 Cr. App R. 92; R v Molyneux and Farmborough (1981) 72 Cr. App R. 111, R v Ayres (1984) AC 447 and R v Pickford [1995] QB 203. It subm......
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Gomez
...to dealings with the property of a company and even to cases where the consent relied on is ultra vires: see R. v. Roffel [1985] V.R. 511; R. v. McHugh [1988] 88 Cr.App.R. 125In my judgment this approach was wrong in law even if the dictum in Morris had been correct. Where a company is acc......
-
Hksar v Cheung Ying Kit, Vicky
...of a company and even to cases where the consent relied on is ultra vires: see Reg. v. Roffel [1985] V.R. 511 and Reg. v. McHugh [1988] 88 Cr.App.R. 385. In my judgment this approach was wrong in law even if the dictum in Morris had been correct. Where a company is accused of a crime the ac......
1 books & journal articles
-
Rethinking Appropriation
...position supporting the majority in Roffel. Professor Smith, TheLawofTheft (6th ed) para 33, further states that McHugh and Ttingham (1988) 88 Cr App R385, accepts that the case law establishes that an act done with the consent or authorityof acompany cannot be theft from the company. In fa......