R v Phekoo
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE WATKINS,MR. JUSTICE HOLLINGS |
| Judgment Date | 27 February 1981 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1981] EWCA Crim J0227-2 |
| Docket Number | No. 2308/C/79 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
- Attorney General's Reference (No. 1 of 2004); R v Edwards; R v Denton; R v Jackson; R v Hendley; R v Crowley
-
R v Kimber
...by the House of Lords. The appeal was dismissed, but their Lordships declined to deal with the issue of belief. 18 In R. v. Phekoo (1981) 1 W.L.R. 1117: 73 Cr. App. R. 107, the defendant was charged with doing acts calculated to interfere with the peace and comfort of a residential occupier......
-
R v Q
...said to be done by an agent and not the landlord himself, it is the former not the latter who is guilty of the offence. 4. In R v Phekoo (1981) 73 Cr App R 107 it was held by this court that section 1(3) did not create an offence of strict liability. That conclusion is, in our judgment, una......
-
B. (A Minor) v DPP
...the charge, irrespective of the grounds for the defendant's belief. The court disapproved of the suggestion made in the earlier case of Regina v. Phekoo [1981] 1 W.L.R. 1117, 1127, that this House intended to confine the views expressed in Morgan's case to cases of rape. 18This reasoning w......
Get Started for Free
