Rolls-Royce Plc v Doughty
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE MUSTILL,LORD JUSTICE BUTLER-SLOSS,SIR JOHN MEGAW |
| Judgment Date | 18 December 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | [1991] EWCA Civ J1219-3 |
| Docket Number | 91/1182 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Date | 18 December 1992 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Parochial Church Council v Wallbank
...eg Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [1986] ECR 1651, para 56. It has been described as a starting point: Doughty v Rolls-Royce Plc [1992] CMLR 1045, 1058, per Mustill LJ. As Brent, para 15.11, note 101, points out, the phrase "emanation of the State" is an Englis......
-
Marie Flora Mcdonald Or Cross And Another V. Highlands And Islands Enterprise And Another
...to be drawn between a body that provides a service to the public and one that provides a service to the state (Rolls-Royce plc v Doughty [1992] ICR 538 per Mustill LJ at 552F). The defenders, he submitted, fell into the latter rather than the former category, and were accordingly not to be ......
-
McCall v Poulton
...an exhaustive statement. In NUT v St Mary's Church of England Junior School [1997] 3 CMLR 630 Scheimann LJ quoted Mustill LJ in Rolls Royce v Doughty [1992] ICR 538 where he said:- “1. Is the applicant correct in contending that the sole test or at any rate the sole test material for pres......
-
Byrne v Motor Insurers' Bureau and Another
...has for that purpose special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between individuals. In Doughty v Rolls Royce [1992] IRLR 126, Mustill LJ held that if the particular entity under consideration does not have special powers, then before it could be......
Request a trial to view additional results