Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd (formerley Huntsman Petrochemicals (UK) Ltd) v Punj Lloyd Ltd (a company incorporated in India) (by original action)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr Justice Stuart-Smith |
| Judgment Date | 10 October 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) |
| Docket Number | Case No: HT-11-311 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Date | 10 October 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Obrascon Huarte Lain SA (Claimant/Appellant) v HM Attorney General for Gibraltar
...activities which are or may become critical. See the reasoning of Stuart-Smith J in Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd (formerly Huntsman Petrochemicals (UK) LTD) v Punj Lloyd Ltd (a company incorporated in India) [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC); [2014] BLR 43 in particular at [166]. 133 Mr Catchpole subm......
-
Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd (formerley Huntsman Petrochemicals (UK) Ltd) v Punj Lloyd Ltd (a company incorporated in India) (by original action)
...by Fenwick Elliott LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 10 October 2013 Mr Justice Stuart-Smith 1 As set out in the main judgment at [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC), SABIC now contends for statutory interest rather than attempting to calculate the cost of completing the works as part of its claim u......
- S.H. v A.H. and Others
4 firm's commentaries
-
Termination Of A Commercial Contract Validly Notified?
...recent case SABIC UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) discusses some issues and risks that arise when terminating a contract. The case involved an EPC contract awarded to a subsidiary of the Defendant for the development of a polyethylene plant for SABIC (the Claim......
-
How does a contractor comply with a duty to proceed regularly and diligently with construction works?
...and elaborated in two more recent English Technology and Construction Court cases, SABIC UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) and Vivergo Fuels Ltd v Redhall Engineering Solutions Ltd [2013] EWHC 4030 In SABIC, the contractor was required to carry out and complete t......
-
Unforeseeable Ground Conditions: The Obrascon Case Reaches The Court Of Appeal
...J in Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd (formerly Huntsman Petrochemicals (UK) Ltd) v Punj Lloyd Ltd (a company incorporated in India) [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) where he said "However, when looking at the other individual elements, two points should be made. First, it is in my judgment most important......
-
Termination - The Need To Prove A Contractor Is In Default In A Long-term Contract
...difficult. Some of the case law in which this provision was discussed are as follows: SABIC UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) - delay is not always conclusive evidence of a lack diligent progress; Hill v London Borough of Camden (1980) 18 B.L.R. 31, CA - time is ......
9 books & journal articles
-
Bankruptcy and insolvency
...parties, may be relevant in considering whether the contractor has shown cause: see Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) at [368], per Stuart-Smith J. 164 Gray v Ware Building Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 271 at [45], per Ward JA. 165 Although the right to engage othe......
-
Table of cases
...Pty Ltd (1992) 9 BCL 280 [Sup Ct SA] I.5.132, II.6.66, II.6.67, II.11.94, III.25.166 Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) I.3.140, II.9.39, II.9.87, II.9.88, II.9.124, II.11.35, II.11.36, II.11.56, II.12.59, II.13.217, II.13.219, III.22.39, III.26.141 Sabic UK......
-
Security for performance
...Co Ltd v Jan De Nul NV [2011] BLR 535 at 540 [17] and 542 [26], per Longmore LJ; Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) at [534]–[543], per Stuart-Smith J. 198 hemehelp Ltd v West [1996] QB 84 at 89, per Waite LJ; Turkiye Is Bankasi AS v Bank of China [1998] 1 L......
-
Damages
...EWCA Civ 372 at [28] and [35], per Moore-Bick LJ. 673 See, by way of illustration, Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd v Punj Lloyd Ltd [2013] EWHC 2916 (TCC) at [531]–[532], per Stuart-Smith J; Fujitsu Services Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2014] EWHC 752 (TCC) at [72]–[82], per Carr J; Macmahon M......
Request a trial to view additional results