Steven James Hunt v (1) Roderick Withinshaw (Former trustee in bankruptcy of Steven James Hunt) (First Respondent) (2) Conwy County Borough Council (Second Respondent)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Mr Justice Morgan |
Judgment Date | 27 October 2015 |
Neutral Citation | [2015] EWHC 3072 (Ch) |
Docket Number | Appeal Ref: CH/2014/0074 |
Date | 27 October 2015 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Duncan Kenric Swift (as trustee of the estates of Nihal Brake and Andrew Brake)
...claims to the part of the property which constituted a dwelling house ( Re Hunt (a Bankrupt) [2014] 1 WLR 254; Hunt v Withinshaw [2015] EWHC 3072 (Ch)). Chedington says there is no market in proprietary estoppel claims, so the trustee cannot have been expected to ‘realise’ the value of th......
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Duncan Kenric Swift (as trustee of the estates of Nihal Brake and Andrew Brake)
...submits that the answer is the latter, not the former.” 9 I then considered the decision of Hunt v Conwy County Borough Council [2015] EWHC 3072 (Ch), which had not previously been cited to me. That was a case where the applicant sought to remove the respondent as a party to a dispute abou......
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Duncan Kenric Swift (as trustee of the estates of Nihal Brake and Andrew Brake)
...have been joined, because it claimed to be a successor in title to the first respondent: see Hunt v Conwy County Borough Council [2015] EWHC 3072 (Ch), [27], [38] (discussed further below). It is enough that it makes that claim, and it does not have to go on to prove it at the trial. 2. Th......
-
Steven James Hunt v (1) Roderick Withinshaw (former Trustee in Bankruptcy of Steven James Hunt) (First Respondent) (2) Conwy County Borough Council (Second Respondent)
...1 This judgment concerns various consequential matters which arise following the judgment which I handed down on 27 October 2015: see [2015] EWHC 3072 (Ch). 2 Each party has made written submissions as to the various consequential matters and each party has then made further written submis......