Google Inc. v Judith Vidal-Hall and Others The Information Commissioner (Intervener)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLady Justice Sharp
Judgment Date27 March 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] EWCA Civ 311
Docket NumberCase No: A2/2014/0403
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date27 March 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
78 cases
  • Representative Claimants v Mgn Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 December 2015
    ...to the unlawful interception of her telephone calls. 21 There was an issue as to whether the decision of this Court in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] 3 WLR 409 had limited the damages for misuse of private information to damages for distress. This Court delivered judgment in that case after......
  • TLT and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 24 June 2016
    ...are recoverable by these claimants for "distress" at common law and that, unless the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. [2015] 3 WLR 409 is overturned or qualified by the Supreme Court, I am bound to hold that damages for distress are also recoverable by them under ......
  • Bermuda Press (Holdings) Ltd v Tamine
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 13 December 2023
    ...Plc v Guardian News and Media Ltd [2009] EWHC 591 Al-Medenni (Nada Fadil) v Mars UK Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1041 Vidal Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 Bermuda Press (Holdings) Ltd v [2023] Bda LR 121 page 2 JUDGMENT of CLARKE P 1. Mr Robert Brockman ("Mr Brockman") was, at the time when t......
  • R. v. Bykovets,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 1 March 2024
    ...State v. Simmons, 190 Vt. 141 (2011); Breyer v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, C-582/14, EU:C:2016:779; Vidal‑Hall v. Google Inc., [2015] EWCA Civ 311, [2016] Q.B. 1003; Quebec (Attorney General) v. 9147-0732 Québec inc., 2020 SCC 32, [2020] 3 S.C.R. 426; R. v. Mills, 2019 SCC 22, ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 firm's commentaries
  • Landmark Decision In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 29 April 2015
    ...landmark decision of the Court of Appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) may lead to a sea-change in how claims are brought for breaches of data protection laws. The judgment classifies the misuse of private information as a tort and allows claimants to recover damages unde......
  • Distressing Changes To The Data Protection Act
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 29 September 2015
    ...Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311 Facts The claim was brought by a number of individuals who had been using Apple's Safari browser to access the internet. They became aware that Google were collecting information about their internet usage without their knowledge or consent through the u......
  • Managing Speculative Claims Following A Data Breach
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 8 November 2021
    ...was only available if an individual could show that they had suffered financial loss. However, the decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 and section 169(5) of the DPA 2018 extend the right to cover other types of damage such as distress. Examples of circumstances where ind......
  • Managing Speculative Claims Following A Data Breach
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 8 November 2021
    ...was only available if an individual could show that they had suffered financial loss. However, the decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311 and section 169(5) of the DPA 2018 extend the right to cover other types of damage such as distress. Examples of circumstances where ind......
  • Get Started for Free
13 books & journal articles
  • Reasonable Expectation and Public Interest: Would the New Zealand Tort of Invasion of Privacy 'Benefit from Re-Examination'?
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 31-2024, January 2024
    • 1 January 2024
    ...Hale. 136 OBG Ltd v Allan [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1 at [255] per Lord Nicholls. 137 Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 31, [2016] QB 1003 at [25] and [41]–[43]. 138 HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd v [2006] EWCA Civ 1776, [2008] Ch 57 at [64]–[65]. 139 Murray v Expre......
  • REVISITING THE LAW OF CONFIDENCE IN SINGAPORE AND A PROPOSAL FOR A NEW TORT OF MISUSE OF PRIVATE INFORMATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December - January 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Lord Nicholls, whose view of the matter was accepted as “obviously correct” by the English Court of Appeal in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311 at [25]. See also OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1 at [118], per Lord Hoffmann and Law Commission of England and Wales (Law Com No 110), Bre......
  • A COMMON LAW TORT OF PRIVACY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...2014) at para 27–44: “Balancing art 8 and art 10”. 39Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd[2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457 at [14]. 40[2015] EWCA Civ 311 (albeit in the context of the rules providing for service of proceedings out of the jurisdiction). The Court of Appeal held nevertheless ......
  • Closing the Floodgates on Privacy Class Actions: Lloyd v Google LLC
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 86-1, January 2023
    • 1 January 2023
    ...US$17m settlement of consumer-based actions in the United States andthe claims underpinning the judgment in Google vVidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311;[2016] QB1003 (Vidal-Hall), which were ultimately settled: Lloyd vGoogle ibid at [2].6 A ‘cookie’is a small block of data that is placed on a de......
  • Get Started for Free