Joseph v Joseph

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
JudgeLORD JUSTICE RUSSELL,THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS
Judgment Date22 July 1966
Neutral Citation[1966] EWCA Civ J0722-4
Date22 July 1966

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Siemens Hearing Instruments Ltd v Friends Life Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 July 2013
    ...had no effect on the claimant's rights under the 1954 Act, and section 38 does not bite. 42 Even if Garston had gone the other way, Joseph v. JosephMarch 1996, [1996] 1 W.L.R. 834:- "Mr. Hodge's argument on behalf of the plaintiffs is as follows. (1) It is not disputed that the tenancy crea......
  • Jones v Wrotham Park Settled Estates
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 January 1978
    ...to such an agreement, and he sought to support this argument by a passage from the judgment of Lord Justice Diplock (as he then was) in Joseph v. Joseph, 167 1 Chancery, p 78, a case involving section 38(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act. 1954, much of the language of which has been adopted......
  • Allnatt London Properties Ltd v Newton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Re Hennessey's Agreement
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Joseph v. Joseph [1967] Ch. 78, C.A. applied. The following case is referred to in the judgment: Joseph v. Joseph [1967] Ch. 78; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 631; [1966] 3 All E.R. 486, C.A. No additional case was cited in argument. ORIGINATING SUMMONS By originating summons dated April 19, 1974, the pl......
  • Get Started for Free