R v Meech

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE ROSKILL,To
Judgment Date12 July 1973
Neutral Citation[1973] EWCA Crim J0712-1
Judgment citation (vLex)[1973] EWCA Crim J0712-2
Date12 July 1973
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo. 773/B2/73 No. 954/B2/73

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • R v Morris (David)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • March 8, 1983
    ...goods were diverted from their true destinations, there had been no assumption of rights and so there was only one appropriation. 29 R. v. Meech (1973) 3 All E.R. 939 . In this case the defendant cashed a cheque in accordance with the instructions of the owner. At the moment he received ......
  • The Crown v Gary Quillan and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • March 25, 2015
    ...and to us which they submitted supported this contention. They were R v Hall (1972) 56 Cr App R 547, Wakeman v Farrar [1974] CLR 136, R v Meech & Ors (1974) 58 Cr App R74, R v McHugh [1993] 97 Cr App R 335, R v Wain [1995] 2 Cr App R 660, Klineberg v Marsden [1999] 1 Cr App R 427, R v Floyd......
  • R v Morris (David)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • October 13, 1983
    ...have followed it. It is wholly consistent with the principles which I have endeavoured to state in this speech. 24 It has been suggested that Meech (1974) 1 Q.B. 549, Skipp (1975) Crim. L.R. 114 - your Lordships also have a transcript of the judgment in this case - and certain other cases a......
  • R v Atakpu and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • March 15, 1993
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • 'Born again' in barbados: the theft act, 1992
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 5-1, June 1995
    • June 1, 1995
    ...was held by Lord Roskill in Morris that there need be no act observable in this sense. 47 Skipp [1975] Critn. L.R. 114; and cf. Meech [1973] 3 All E.R. 939; Hircock (1978) 67 Cr. App. R. 278; A.G. for Hong Kong v. Chan NaiKeung (1988) 86 Cr. App. R. 174; McHugh v. Tringham [1989]3 All E.R. ......
  • Taking possession: the defining element of theft?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 3, December 2008
    • December 1, 2008
    ...above n 4. (174) That is, the act falls within the meaning of an appropriation. (175) See, eg, R v Hinks [2001] 2 AC 241. (176) [1974] QB 549. (177) Ormerod and Williams, above n 97, 93; Smith, above n 135, 113-14. (178) (Unreported, Manchester Crown Court, Judge Da Cunha, 20 December 1972)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT