Buckoke v Greater London Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE MASTER of THE ROLLS,LORD JUSTICE SACHS,LORD JUSTICE BUCKLEY |
| Judgment Date | 15 February 1971 |
| Neutral Citation | [1971] EWCA Civ J0215-1 |
| Date | 15 February 1971 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
R v Board of Visitors of Hull Prison, ex parte St Germain
...ofjurisdiction, is at any rate rendered doubtful by the observations of Lord Denning, Master of the Rolls, obiter dicta, in Buckoke v. Greater London Council (1971) Chancery 655, at page 669. 48 Nevertheless, it is in my view open to this Court, particularly in the light of the very special......
- Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union
-
Tishelle Browne Claimant v Lennox Israel 1 Defendant/Ancillary Defendant Maurice Robertson 2 Defendant/ancillary Claimant Attorney General 3 Defendant [ECSC]
...to the condition of the road in question and paid no heed to the siren of the ambulance indicating an emergency. See —Buckoke and Others v Greater London Council (1971) 2WLR 760, 774 where the court stated "It is common knowledge that members of the public on a highway customarily give prec......
- Re Niles (No 2)
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Disciplinary proceedings against the bar: what is the proper role of the court of appeal?
...must act fairly just the same as anyone else; and are just as subject to control by the courts” Buckoke v. Greater London Council [1971] 2 All ER 254. The Master of the Rolls was essentially referring to the supervisory jurisdiction of the courts. It certainly cannot be that the Court of Ap......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...of evils points much more clearly in favour of committing the offence.Fire appliances and red lightsIn Buckoke v.Greater London Council (1971) RTR 131(instructions issued to drivers offire-engines), Lord Denning accepted as correct the proposition that a driver would haveno defence if he pr......
-
Letters to Editor
...parte Blackburn,(1968)2QBD118.13Regulation 1, Schedule 1 (3).llSeee.g.Arrosmithv. Jenkins (1963)2QBD561;BuckokeV.TheGreaterLondonCouncil (1971) Ch. 655.lOR. v.Kennedy(1902) 86 L.T. 753; Duchesne v. Finch (1912)TLR440.'HR. v.Byrde&PontypoolGasCo. (1890)LJMC17; see also MagistratesCourtsAct, ......
-
The Constitutional Independence of a Police Constable in the Exercise of the Powers of His Office
...parte Blackburn,(1968)2QBD118.13Regulation 1, Schedule 1 (3).llSeee.g.Arrosmithv. Jenkins (1963)2QBD561;BuckokeV.TheGreaterLondonCouncil (1971) Ch. 655.lOR. v.Kennedy(1902) 86 L.T. 753; Duchesne v. Finch (1912)TLR440.'HR. v.Byrde&PontypoolGasCo. (1890)LJMC17; see also MagistratesCourtsAct, ......