R v Marcus
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | MR. JUSTICE TUDOR EVANS |
| Judgment Date | 09 April 1981 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1981] EWCA Crim J0409-2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 149/A1/80 |
| Date | 09 April 1981 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Jordan Thompson v R
...Crim App R 41 ) or that the nature or quality and the quantity of the substance administered was known ( R v Lily Marcus [1981] 73 Cr [1981] 2 All ER 833 App R 49 and R v Hill (1986) 83 Cr App R 386 ). Counsel argued that the cases seemed to suggest that a substance could only be regarded a......
-
Thompson v R
...Crim App R 41) or that the nature or quality and the quantity of the substance administered was known ( R v Lily Marcus [1981] 73 Cr [1981] 2 All ER 833 App R 49 and R v Hill (1986) 83 Cr App R 386). Counsel argued that the cases seemed to suggest that a substance could only be regarded as ......
-
Barry Terrence Veysey Damien Munroe Jamie Beardshaw v The Queen
...to refuse the submissions, and that Mr Rule's argument is contrary to authority. Mr Cray particularly relied on the case of Marcus [1981] 1 WLR 774. The defendant in that case had introduced powdered sedatives into bottles of milk which had been delivered to the doorstep of her neighbour's......
-
R v Hill
...or caused them to be taken by the boys. Furthermore, this court has already given guidance on the meaning of the words "noxious thing" in Reg. v. Marcus [1981] 1 W.L.R. 774. It is enough for present purposes to record that, in that case, a wide meaning was given to those words. In particula......
Request a trial to view additional results