St. James' and Pall Mall Electric Light Company Ltd v Westminster Assessment Committee
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Lord Atkin |
Judgment Date | 09 November 1933 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1933] UKHL J1109-1 |
Date | 09 November 1933 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Morecambe and Heysham Corporation v Robinson
...it; Kingston Union Assessment Committee v. Metropclitan Water Board, 1926 Appeal Cases, page 331, and St. James and Pall Hall Electric Light Co. v. Westminster Assessment Committee, 1934 Appeal Cases, page 33; Metropolitan Water Board v. Hertford, 1953, volume 1 All England Law Reports, pag......
-
Mid-Northamptonshire Water Board v Lee (Valuation Officer)
...basis as it was stated in the Kingston case and as it was applied in this House in the case of St. James' and Pall Mall Electric Light Company v. Westminster Assessment Committee [1934] A.C. 33. The argument is in substance the same as part of the argument which was presented, without succe......
-
Mid-Northamptonshire Water Board v Lee (Valuation Officer)
...Appeal Cases at pages 353-4- We think it plaint hat it cannot stand with the reasoning of the House of Lords in the St. James's case, 1934 Appeal Cases, 33. The hypothetical landlord who builds a waterworks would reasonably expect to receive enough rent to enable him to pay interest on the......
-
British Transport Commission v Hingley
...has acquired (page 279 G). 25 Lord Atkin in ( St. James and Pall Mall Electric Light Co. v. Westminster Assessment Committee 1934 Appeal Cases at page 41) gave, as examples of the public utility undertakings to which the profits basis should be applied, mines, docks and harbours, sewage and......
Request a trial to view additional results