Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Company Ltd
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judge | Lord Buckmaster,Lord Warrington of Clyffe,Lord Atkin,Lord Russell of Killowen,Lord Macmillan |
Judgment Date | 10 December 1931 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1931] UKHL J1210-1 |
Date | 10 December 1931 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
143 cases
-
Buchanan (James) & Company Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (U.K.) Ltd
...law, or by English legal precedent, but on broad principles of general acceptation: Stag Line Ltd. v. Foscolo, Mango and Co. LtdELR. [1932] A.C 328. per Lord Macmillan, at p. 350. Moreover, it is perfectly legitimate in my opinion to look for assistance, if assistance is needed, to the Fren......
-
Kathleen Feest v (1) South West Strategic Health Authority (First Defendant/Appellant) (2) UK Foundation Programme Office (Second Defendant) Bay Island Voyages (Third Party/Respondent)
...the Athens Convention. In Buchanan v Babco, Lord Wilberforce was doing no more than echo what was said by Lord Macmillan in Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango and Co. Ltd [1932] AC 328 at 350. The House of Lords was concerned in that case with the meaning of the phrase "reasonable deviation" in......
-
Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd
...to the principles upon which international conventions are to be interpreted (see Buchanan's case vide supra and Stag Line Ltd. v. Foscolo, Mango and Co. Ltd. 1932 A.C. 328, 350). 2. Interpretation of the French text according to the same principles but with additional linguistic problems.......
-
Harrisons Trading (Peninsular) Sdn Bhd v Juta Perkara Sdn Bhd and Others
... ... I presume were directors of the first defendant company, in consideration of goods supplied and credit extended to ... See Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo Mango & Co Ltd [1931] All ER 666, ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (November 20– November 24)
...al, 2007 MBCA 8, National Bank of Greece (Canada) v Katsikonouris, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1029, Stag Line, Limited v Foscolo, Mango & Co, Ltd, [1932] AC 328 (UK HL), Sher-Bett Construction (Manitoba) Inc v The Co-operators General Insurance Company, 2021 MBCA 10, Ontario v St. Paul Fire and Marine......
-
Convention On Limitation Of Liability For Maritime Claims 1976
...Act of 10 December 1990 and the German Road Traffic Act of 19 December 1952 [1998] 2 Lloyds Rep 39 per Thomas J [1992] 1 Lloyds Rep 373 [1932] AC 328, 350 and (1980) 147 CLR 142, Referring to W Tetley, "Damages and economic loss in marine collision: Controlling the Floodgates" (1991) 22 Jou......
8 books & journal articles
-
Carriage of Goods under Bills of Lading and Similar Documents
...195 See above note 192. 196 See above B, "International Rules Governing Bills of Lading." 197 Stag Line Ltd. v. Foscolo, Mango &> Co., [1932] A.C. 328 (H.L.); Maxine Footwear Co. v. Canadian Government Merchant Marine Ltd., [1959] A.C. 589 (EC.); Dominion Glass Co. v. Anglo Indian (The), [1......
-
Treaties
...case, a treaty has been incorporated in a statute, as Lord Macmillan stated in Stag Line, Ltd. v. Foscolo, Mango & Co., Ltd. et al ., [1932] A.C. 328 at p. 350: It is important to remember that the Act of 1924 was the outcome of an International Conference and that the rules in the Schedule......
-
SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2ND SEPTEMBER 1998
...and Industry;[1990] 2 AC 418 at 500; Reg v Home Secretary; Ex p. Brind[1991] 1 AC 696 at 747,760. 16 Stag Line, Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Co[1932] AC 328 at 350; and see James Buchanan & Co Ltd v Babco Forwarding and Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 at 152; Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd198......
-
Treaty implementation in Caribbean law and practice
...(James) & Co. v. Babco Forwarding & Shipping (U.K) Ltd. [1977] Q.B. 208, [1977] 2 W.L.R. 107; Stag Line Ltd. v. Foscolo Mango &Co. Ltd. [1932] A.C. 328, at 350. the treaty itself and not merely municipal law. This means that the proper exercise of the judicial function may soon require more......
Request a trial to view additional results