Wilsons and Clyde Coal Company v English

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLord Atkin,Lord Thankerton,Lord Macmillan,Lord Wright,Lord Maugham
Judgment Date19 July 1937
Judgment citation (vLex)[1937] UKHL J0719-3
CourtHouse of Lords
Docket NumberNo. 6.
Date19 July 1937
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
389 cases
  • Carter (John) (Fine Worsteds) Ltd v Hanson Haulage (Leeds) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 14 December 1964
    ...not operating in the case of the former. In this connection reference was Made to the case of ( Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co. v. English 1938 Appeal Cases page 57), and the case of ( Lochgelly Iron and Coal Co. v. McMullan 1934 Appeal Cases page 1) was mentioned though not otherwise referred to.......
  • Hall (Winston) v Glencore Alumina Jamaica Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 24 November 2008
    ...of the following; safe employees for him to work with, safe equipment, a safe place of work and a safe system of work. (See Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co. Ltd. v English [1938] A.C. 57 at pp. 78 and 86.) 4 Mr. Hall's description of the event is contained in paragraph 15 and 16 of his witness s......
  • Walker (Marjorie), Michael Costa and Kenneth Neysmith, executors of the estate of Neville Walker (Deceased) v Victor Lobban
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 20 December 2005
    ...law duty to his workmen is well settled. It is a duty to take reasonable care in all the circumstances of the case. In Wilsons & Clyde Coal Company v. English [1937] 3 All ER 628, Lord Wright describes this duty as one which imposes on an employer an obligation to provide a reasonably safe......
  • Lian Soon Hing Shipping Co; Ting Jie Hoo
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1990
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Working from home in the COVID-19 era – what are the ‘domestic duties' of the employer?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 April 2020
    ...staff, adequate materials, proper systems of work and effective oversight and enforcement (see Wilson and Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English [1938] AC 57). Any implemented risk management system must be monitored, enforced and reviewed Place of Work The duty to provide a safe 'place of work' exten......
  • Safe Volunteering: The Ups And Downs Of Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 13 October 2011
    ...of the duty of care owed by an employer to an employee was established in the case of Wilson and Clyde Coal Company Ltd v English [1937] 3 All ER 628. This case held that an employer owes a "duty of care" to his employees, which was personal to the employer and not capable of delegation. Th......
13 books & journal articles
  • Employers' Liability at Common Law: Two Competing Paradigms
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , May 2008
    • 1 May 2008
    ...as well as delictual. The delictual duty had first been recognised by the House of Lords in Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English,4040[1938] AC 57. but it was not until twenty years later, in the case of Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage Co Ltd,4141[1957] AC 555. Lister concerned the du......
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Interpretation of Agreements
    • 4 August 2020
    ...267 Robb v Green , [1895] 2 QB 315 (CA). 268 Amber Size & Chemical Co v Menzel , [1913] 2 Ch 239. 269 Williams & Clyde Coal Co v English , [1938] AC 57 (HL). General Principles of Interpretation 851 the employer to provide something less than reasonable notice would preclude the implication......
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Contracts Part Five
    • 1 September 2005
    ...v. Green , [1895] 2 Q.B. 315. 203 Amber Size & Chemical Co. v. Menzel , [1913] 2 Ch. 239. 204 Williams & Clyde Coal Co . v. English , [1938] A.C. 57 (H.L.). General Principles of Interpretation 745 press indication of an intention on the part of the employer to provide something less than r......
  • Rough Justice in an Unjust World
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 65-2, March 2002
    • 1 March 2002
    ...as ‘mixed liability’: ‘Mixed and vicarious liability – a suggested distinction’(1966) 29 MLR 160.51 Wilson and Clyde Coal Co vEnglish [1938] AC 57.52 See Honeywill & Stein vLarkin Bros [1934] 1 KB 102; Tarry vAshton (1876) 1 QBD 314.53 n 7 above at 1335, para 60. Nevertheless, Laddie J in B......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT